Are Broken Capalerries On Breasts

COMING SOON ......

........... MAS DE "Mis fotos de aviones " , del ayer y del hoy..

Dementia Sudden Onset Confusion

Incorporation and droit de seigneur

Do not ask me how, but I have received news of the future, a story that will appear in the media in 100 years, in 2111. It appears that the crisis will force the government to make reforms, with the agreement of all stakeholders:

---

been a month since it reached a grand bargain between government and major trade unions. Thanks to this agreement was approved law droit de seigneur limited. This law guarantees the right of the large shareholders to use sexually / the workers in their companies. The government spokesman said:

This reform is a necessary sacrifice to get out of the crisis. With the efforts of all sure that soon we will.

Since the first countries adopted laws droit de seigneur, analysts agree that sooner or later everyone will have to do, is globalization. Countries that have not yet recognized this right, attend helpless to slow but steady flight of capital to countries that already have this law. Our country, being one of the few in our environment without law droit de seigneur, was unattractive to investors. This reform was needed to restore competitiveness and to end hunger in our country. As one of our major economic analysts:

The adoption of the law of droit de seigneur is not a choice, is not optional. Is indispensable if we are to prevent the country from sinking into the crisis. This has nothing to do with ideology, this is simply economics.

For its part, the opposition spokesman said:

We're warning for years that the damage was done to our economy, the lack of this law. The government again reforms to late and poorly.

The joint statement from leaders of major trade unions presented:

This agreement is good news for workers and workers of this country. We managed to avoid the imposition by law of droit de seigneur total, as claimed by some. We are aware that this is a sacrifice, but what is harder? "Be used sexually or starve for lack of investment? The unions have once again demonstrated our responsibility to combat the severe crisis that we all suffer.

Indeed the law has been passed in our country have notable differences with others in other countries. Here only be granted this right, shareholders holding more than 30% of the shares, not 5% as happens in other places. It also includes the provision of premium note, ie may only use this right only once per worker in other countries do not include this limitation.

Moreover parity Minister has come out against the insinuations which appeared in some media about the possible sexist nature of the law, and said:

The amendment that passed in Congress guarantees parity in the sexual use of workers. In any case, the sexual differences in use may exceed 70% of one sex over another. So these suggestions are completely unjustified. Take this opportunity to encourage women shareholders of this country to make use of this new right as they are doing their fellow shareholders and not get carried away by outdated stereotypes.

The controversy has emerged this week as a result of the violence of Miss SDP The problem appeared when a controlling shareholder of the company where he works, Mr. TBG, decided to enjoy their legal right to use her sexual. Then the worker responded with brutal violence. The police had to intervene. Their resistance was so rampant that it took four police officers to hold each of their limbs, so the shareholder finally able to exercise their legal right. Time is reflected in the image:



Mr. TBG after completing their sexual use said: " and are removed one the desire " and then said " such acts are those who tarnish the image of our country internationally and curb investment "


Police have launched an investigation into this incident. As reported by the press, following a search at the home of the aggressor has found a Koran, which is investigating his links with Islamic terrorism. Also found photos of a trip he made last August to Bilbao, which relates to the terrorism of ETA, so that has opened a new line of research. In a new statement, ETA considered unacceptable this innuendo and denounced the truce

The English Government returns to attack us, so we terminate our eternal truce as-you-swear-by-our-beret.

The alleged terrorist has become an icon for minority groups that are protesting the law. These statements (not usually exceed the ten participants) always end in violence and terrorism. One of our leading commentators explains the reasons are behind this opposition:

The defense of freedom can not have restrictions. Each and every one of us can become large shareholders of the multinational, so the droit de seigneur, as indicated by the same expression is a right over that anyone can freely enjoy. Each and every one of us has the right to use sexually employees, without any intervention by the state should take away that right. Since I'm always in favor of expanding freedom, I am in favor of the droit de seigneur. Who is against? interventionist socialists, terrorists, the misfits ... that is, the enemies of freedom. Why do you reject this right? Because they sense that they can never access it because they are lazy and a failure. What underlies his opposition is a deep envy.

can participate in our survey on this article:

do you think this is because our president and the main trade unions have approved a law of droit de seigneur limited and not a total :

• Option A: There is no bad intention, they did so simply because they do not understand anything about economics.
• Option B: is a way for our president to stay in power for unions to maintain their privileges and subsidies.
• Option C: Our president and the main trade unions have an allergy to freedom and dream of creating a totalitarian system and liberticidal.

PS: Any resemblance to reality is purely coincidental